Luke

Twilight

Movie Reviews  |  PG-13  |  View Trailer  |  Nov 21, 2008

"Warning: This is a brutal, bolt, and somewhat offensive review – not vulgar or inappropriate, but harsh and mean. Every point is backed with evidence."

twilight1
- Rated PG-13 for some violence and a scene of sensuality. 
- Who's going to like it: A movie for teen girls and lonely middle-age women, based on a book made for people who have never read a good book before

No matter how bad this or any other reviews for Twilight are, the movie will still make millions and millions of dollars. Because there are so many blind fans of Stephenie Meyer’s books, the movie is critic proof. So I’m going to try my best to convey to you how awfully bad this movie is so you don’t waste your time or your money in supporting talentless entertainment.

THE STORY

Twilight tells the story of an awkward teen named Bella Swan who moves to the small town Forks, Washington to live with her dad. It doesn’t take time for Bella to fall for a strange outcast classmate Edward Cullen.

After Edward shows supernatural speed and strength while saving her from being smashed by a runaway car, Bella begins to question his powers. Shortly thereafter she finds out that he and his family are “vegetarian” vampires, feeding solely on animals – not humans. Instead of being afraid of their potential danger, Bella flocks to them and falls in teen-love with Edward.

The real plot and conflict doesn’t enter until 90 minutes into this two-plus-hour movie when a trio of evil vampires (meaning they feed on humans) introduces themselves to the Cullens. After catching a whiff of Bella’s flesh, two of the three set their sights on draining her veins – so much so that they follow her across the United States.

PROBLEMS WITH THE STORY

Twilight very well could have been a great story. But it’s not. It’s boring. Nothing ever happens.

The way the story is told is insulting to an audience. The movie leaves blatantly obvious hints at where the story will be going in the next installments. While leaving the theater, I asked my 14-year-old Twilight know-it-all sister-in-law if my predictions on each of the next three storylines were correct. Sure enough, I was dead-on.

The idea of vampires has been around for hundreds of years. For some reason, Meyer decided to rewrite their mythology. Her vampires can go out during the daytime. If sunlight touches their skin, it only shows them the way they really appear – sparkly skinned. Stakes through the heart don’t kill vampires; you must remove their heads and limbs, and then set them on fire. But like the vampires in Underworld, these ones are mortal enemies with werewolves.

If the conflict of the story does not become evident until the end of the movie, then you have nothing driving the story up to that point. In Twilight, the plot doesn’t start until the third act. Even romance novels have lame plots going on throughout them. For some reason, this one doesn’t.

Asking your audience to suspend their disbelief over and over again is asking a lot. If you expect us to believe that two vampires are going to travel over a thousand miles to feed on one specific human when they easily could have feasted millions of times on the course there, you’ve got to give a good motivation for it. Don’t ask us to accept it just because you say it.

Twilight is filled with tons of holes. Some are filled in with mindless filler, others left wide open. Considering how big and anticipated this movie is, by now, there should have been some thought put into this production.

PROBLEMS WITH THE MOVIE

Had Twilight been subject to a good studio treatment (including rewriting, casting bigger stars, and earning a big budget), it could have been a decent, if not great, movie. But it wasn’t. It was made by a tiny independent studio – and it shows. It suffers because of that.

Certain moments of Twilight are great. They are well done and work perfectly. But those moments are few and far between. The majority of the moments between the memorable good ones are so awful that they completely undo the positives made by the good ones.

Casting nearly all no-name actors was a brave decision. Kristen Stewart, mostly known for her role in last year’s Into The Wild, is a fantastic young actress that brings the most acting talent to movie. In the moments of the film that work, she’s exceptional as Bella. But in the moments that don’t work, she’s bland. (Wait until you see her minute-long scene where she’s cross eyed).

Robert Pattinson, known only for his role in the Harry Potter film franchise, brought nothing to the role that couldn’t have been done by any awful young actor from the CW network. For the majority of the movie, he acts like he’s trying to be the coolest guy in the world, wearing the most obvious fake-colored contact lenses. The rest of the time he tries acting like the lab-created hybrid child of Jason Bourne and James Bond, but is completely unsuccessful at reaching any level of thier badassness.

Twilight was directed by Catherine Hardwicke, who also directed such horrible flicks as The Nativity Story and Lords of Dogtown – and it shows. The tone and feeling of the movie is never consistent. Most of the time it feels like a bad blend of an episode of Supernatural, a bad horror movie and any given Michael Bay blockbuster, constantly spinning around the actors and over-using slow motion. Twilight feels like it was directed by an undergrad BYU film student. My dreams have better direction than this film.

No review of this movie is complete without mentioning the lack of decent-looking special effects. The stunts that involve gravity defying jumping or climbing look just fine since we’re now used to seeing wire flying in movies. But the scenes that involve computer-generated effects look downright terrible. In one scene, Edward throws Bella on his back and has a high-speed dash up a mountainside. The final product ends up looking like an old Looney Toons chase between the Roadrunner and Wile E. Coyote, legs blurred and all.

CONLUSION

Twilight is awful. I am not the only one who feels this way. Listen to the other critics. Even my die-hard sister-in-law thought it was just “so-so.” Listen to the polls. If you go to Twilight and come out ranting and raving about how good it was, you are a liar. You want it to be that good so bad that you’re in denial.

Twilight is not worth the hype. It’s made for teenagers and middle aged lonely women who have finally realized that life isn’t the fairytale they wanted it to be. It’s for pathetic people looking for a fake romance that doesn’t exist in this exaggerated form. It’s made for ignorant people who have never read good literature.

Many people have said, “I want to see Twilight just to see what it’s all about and why it’s considered so bad.” Here’s what I say to you: If you’re that curious to see it, then go to a theater, buy a ticket for Quantum of Solace or Bolt – anything – then walk into the Twilight. Don’t you dare buy a ticket that will put money in the pockets of people who don’t deserve it.

Beware that if you’ve never read the books and you see Twilight in the opening weeks when the theater is filled with Meyer fans, then you’ll probably hate the experience. Women and girls will be giggling at inside jokes from the books that you wont understand. They’ll all start cheering every time a new character appears onscreen for the first time. You’ll hear a simultaneous scream of the name “Stephenie” the second that Meyer makes her three-second cameo. Be prepared to be annoyed.

Photo credit: Summit Entertainment


 1/2 out of 5 (1/2 out of 5)


blog comments powered by Disqus